View Full Version : Is India really independent


JSR
08-11-2004, 03:02 PM
092236558
#6103By JSR on Wednesday, August 11, 2004 - 3:02 pm

New article:
Is India Really Independent?
By S. Bakre

AUSTIN, TEXAS, August 7, 2004 -- August 15th, 2004 will signify 57 years of freedom for India. Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister, gave a speech to the Constituent Assembly at midnight on August 14, 1947. “At the dawn of history India started on her unending quest…she has never lost sight of that quest or forgotten the ideals which gave her strength. We end today, a period of ill fortune and India discovers herself again.” His speech inspired us with ideals about a new beginning for India.
Has India lived up to these ideals? Although the British no longer occupy India, is she really independent of their influence? While they were in India, we began to follow their traditions, their philosophies, and their lifestyle. We silently allowed them desecrate our heritage, culture and religion. Yet now, it is we, the Indians that continue to honor those who tried to destroy our culture.
Perhaps the biggest tragedy has been in the area of religion. We have continued to carry the torch for the British missionaries in their attempts to dissuade our belief system. We continue to allow the desecration of the essence of Bhartiya culture and tradition -- the scriptures. Not only do we believe in wrong information, we allow for the propagation of it through textbooks in prestigious Indian schools and universities. Fictitious theories about the Aryan invasion, the history of Indian civilization, the origin of our scared Sanskrit language are being taught to our youth even today.
Let’s take one example of a great Indian philosopher, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, President of India from 1962 to 1967. Widely renowned for his philosophical writings and lectures, he was highly influenced by the books of the European writers who wrote about Hinduism and the history of India. His own writings perpetuated the British belief system rather than the knowledge of Bhartiya scriptures.*
For example he wrote in his book Indian Philosophy Vol.1, “Rama is only a good and great man, a high-souled hero, who utilized the services of the aboriginal tribes in civilizing the south, and not an avatar of Vishnu. The religion it reflects is frankly polytheistic and external.”
Further, Radhakrishnan remarked that “brahamanization of Krsna religion and elevating Vishnu as the great God took place around 300BC.” In his writings he has called the early Hindus ‘the beast’, the Divine wisdom of the Rishis ‘the God-making factory,’ and defined the Vedic religion as ‘the religion of the primitive man in the world of ghosts and goblins who were only satisfied with bloody sacrifices.’ He described the teachings of the Upnishads and the Puranas as ‘speculation, myth, parables and heretical doctrines,’ called Mahabharat ‘a non-Aryan epic poem’ and tells that ‘the higher mysticism of Yog Darshan was mixed with drug intoxication.’
In fact, Hinduism, originally called Sanatan Dharm, is a universal religion intended for the whole world, not for any specific race. The Vedic culture is the heritage of world civilizations and we should be proud that it originated in India, not shy away from it. The spiritual wisdom of ancient India is a gift to mankind and we as Indians need to cherish, nurture and be proud of it.
Many of us want to be “like the West”. We wear Western clothes, watch cable TV, send our children to convent schools and allow them to be taught by the very books that were authored by the British. The impressions of our freedom struggle are from a history book in English rather than our national language. Trousers and shirts replace traditional dress. Urban youth are shying away from Indian culture and gravitating towards Western assimilation. Modernization has been equated with Westernization. Somewhere along the way 150 years of the ‘Raj’ has definitely left its mark.
We have somehow lost our way towards the pursuit of independence, and have continued to be ruled by an invisible ‘Raj’. We have lost sight of our quest. We have forgotten the ideals which gave us strength. There is still time to change the future, to return to our roots. We can re-discover India’s timeless teachings, we can change the generations to come. Perhaps the question is not whether we have the ability to do it, but rather will we take on the challenge?

* His book and thousands of others like it are prescribed for higher studies in Indian institutions.

This article is presented by The Vedic Foundation, a non-profit, educational organization whose aim is to “Reestablish the Greatness of Hinduism.” For information visit: thevedicfoundation.org

mysticsdream
08-16-2004, 09:21 AM
092648087
#6122By mysticsdream on Monday, August 16, 2004 - 9:21 am

Is this an article written from Austin Texas on the pure Indian culture? If so it must have been referring to the Apache.. really if the argument is about decontaminating the essence of India from the west... why refer to an expert in Texas. Nothing could be more fallacious. India has a great culture look inward not beyond. And don't argue that the replacement of British imperialism by a guru from Texas is an advancement! Maybe you would be better concentrating on beating the Aussies at cricket

wycough
08-17-2004, 03:25 AM
092713155
#6124By wycough on Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - 3:25 am

mystics.. your correct again. The non-aussie minds are so insular and rigid. Our universality is needed, but I do become with our American cousins seemingly knowing all. A bit like the Brits in the 1950's

mysticsdream
08-17-2004, 05:57 AM
092722224
#6125By mysticsdream on Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - 5:57 am

I wrote a response but it does not appear.. I'll be short in case it does or is elsewhere.

In part I have some sympathy with JSR. Somewhere on here is a subject title "The legacy of the British" which deals with post colonialism.

We as whites in Australia understand what it is to destroy language and culture of the indiginous. We understand stolen children and ill advised attempts to impose a white culture.

But there is a fallacy in any argument which laments westernisation on the one hand and refers to a US source.. or is written from the US. Either that person is taking from the west on the one hand and complaining about the west on the other (which is probably the case.. and hence one of double standards) or is just confused.

In any case colonialism in India has imparted some cultural benefits.. and the Indians would prefer to beat Australia or Pakistan at cricket than win a gold medal in the Olympics.

It is only because I respect India that I have challenged such loose logic. I met a lovely young Indian woman on a tour of Europe, and we correspond.. and enjoy each other, and I'd have to say she is caught between the past and the future, and may choose an arranged marriage etc. If she does I am sure it will be a wise choice in the long run. But I admit that her mind is a lot more brilliant than mine.. she is bio nano technoligist with a masters degree and working in New York.. and steps between two worlds. India needs to find its own balance between technology and culture, preserving whats valuable and moving to a new future. Politically its recent elections wanted a greater distribution of economic wealth. I think there is a sense that this is a vote against caste (unequal rights) and tradition

suresh
09-25-2004, 05:02 PM
096131730
#6544By suresh on Saturday, September 25, 2004 - 5:02 pm

I find there is not a single Indian who is expressing regarding India and its situation(s). Isn't it weird?